The problems encountered are often the appearance of a certain stage, such as the retention index has been falling, how to improve? If you look at this problem and delve into it, it is estimated that it will be difficult to solve it.
It should be analyzed from the source, first look at the trend of this product in the market, the situation of competing products, changes in the degree of user demand dependence, etc.; then look at the conversion from the source of users and the steps of user use; then look at the data and the research report. Wait, analyze and think to find the problem, and finally think of the solution.
If you ignore the previous analysis Latest Mailing Database process and think about the solution directly, it is definitely not feasible. Because you don't understand this, you don't know where the problem is, why give a solution.
So, no matter what problem you encounter, don't dig in and think of a solution first, but sort out the problem from the source.
2. Analyze the problem based on facts
When analyzing problems, you must find first-hand information, and do not use subjective speculation or "legends" as the basis for analysis. The basis of the analysis is wrong, and the decision cannot be right.
This problem is encountered more in life. For example, our parents are often misled by the unscrupulous self-media to believe in the wrong fitness and health care content. When parents encounter such a problem, they actually cannot tell whether the received information is correct or not, so they make wrong decisions.
As practitioners, we will be much better, just go to the source of the information. Pursuing authority or first-hand sources of information is too difficult for parents.
The same is true in the workplace, there will be gossip information that affects our judgments about someone and something. In fact, we should go to the clouds to see the sun, find out the facts of this person, and then make a judgment. Otherwise, there will be misunderstandings, insufficient communication, affecting work efficiency, and making wrong decisions.
3. Break down the problem logically
I have seen several senior talents recently, including those at the GM level of big factories. I think the ability they must have is: the ability to dismantle problems according to their goals.
Having this ability means:
To look at this product from a high perspective and the origin of the target, it is the most basic to have this perspective when people are in this position;
After the problem is dismantled, the organizational structure of the team has also come out, and then focus on how to collaborate efficiently, which is also an important issue related to success or failure;
From the re-examination of the degree of understanding of the implementation items, such as where the key points and difficulties are. Those who have the ability to land must know that managers who only talk about empty words are very scary.
In the above paragraph, many senior managers can be blocked. You will find that even if they can reach this level, it does not mean that they have this ability, either there is no logic for dismantling, or the logic of decision-making does not make sense. For example, why do you do it, what problem is it to solve, and what is the decision-making process.